<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Mike's Blog &#187; General</title>
	<atom:link href="http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/category/general/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com</link>
	<description>One of probably a thousand Mike's Blogs out there...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:09:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SC License Plate # GCF 541</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/02/03/sc-license-plate-gcf-541/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/02/03/sc-license-plate-gcf-541/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Feb 2012 23:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=455</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey, driver of the Lexus SUV with SC plate # GCF 541. Yeah, you, the one with the sticker in your rear window that looks like a strand of paper dolls.
Yeah, you suck at driving. You cut me off while you were driving recklessly, and failed to take any corrective action once aware of your [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, driver of the Lexus SUV with SC plate # GCF 541. Yeah, you, the one with the sticker in your rear window that looks like a strand of paper dolls.</p>
<p>Yeah, you suck at driving. You cut me off while you were driving recklessly, and failed to take any corrective action once aware of your recklessness.</p>
<p>We were both in left turn lanes, you to the inside, me to the outside. Instead of turning into the left lane, you swept into my lane. You left me with a choice of either slamming into the housing project, or slamming on my brakes and hoping the guy behind me was paying attention.</p>
<p>I honked at you. I don&#8217;t think you realized, since you were ON THE PHONE. So as I passed you, I honked again to alert you of my vehicle. I couldn&#8217;t trust that you were paying attention. You didn&#8217;t signal during the initial turn, so I was unsure if you were about to swing back into my lane.</p>
<p>You were still ON THE PHONE. You didn&#8217;t even look over to recognize that you were a safety hazard.</p>
<p>You were behind me the rest of the way because, coincidentally, we both decided to pass the exact same cars at the exact same time. Of course, I always signaled before I initiated a lane change, and you NEVER signaled before you initiated a lane change.</p>
<p>I watched in my rear view mirror as you finished your call. After you completed your call, you then placed another call. You were talking on the phone when I turned out of the 50mph rush hour traffic onto a side street.</p>
<p>It is my greatest hope that, upon the crash you cause due to your recklessness and inattentiveness, you only injure yourself.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/02/03/sc-license-plate-gcf-541/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Your Co-worker For President</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/01/19/your-co-worker-for-president/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/01/19/your-co-worker-for-president/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:43:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=449</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Self-discredited former governor, Fox News commentator, and celebrity blogger Sarah Palin said yesterday:
If I had to vote in South Carolina, in order to keep this thing going I&#8217;d vote for Newt and I would want this to continue.
I&#8217;m shocked!
Are you telling me that Fox News contributor Sarah Palin is encouraging people to vote for (former) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Self-discredited former governor, Fox News commentator, and celebrity blogger Sarah Palin said yesterday:</p>
<blockquote><p>If I had to vote in South Carolina, in order to keep this thing going I&#8217;d vote for Newt and I would want this to continue.</p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;m shocked!</p>
<p>Are you telling me that Fox News contributor Sarah Palin is encouraging people to vote for (former) Fox News contributor Newt Gingrich?!</p>
<p>Again, I&#8217;m shocked!</p>
<p>On a totally different note, who does this picture of Newt make you think of?</p>
<p><img src="http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/uploads/newt-schrute.jpg" alt="Newt Schrute Gingrich" /></p>
<p>Yeah, he looks like <a href="http://goo.gl/PgCwb" target="_blank">Dwight Schrute</a>.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/01/19/your-co-worker-for-president/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>DirecTV May Suck.</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/01/18/directv-may-suck/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/01/18/directv-may-suck/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 00:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=437</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATED Jan. 19, 2012: See comment below
Uhh&#8230; DirecTV&#8230; do you suck, or are you just shady? That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m trying to figure out.
I want to order. I have perfect credit. I have never missed a payment on anything ever. I have owned my home for almost a decade, and don&#8217;t plan on moving at all.
It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>UPDATED Jan. 19, 2012: See comment below</strong></p>
<p>Uhh&#8230; DirecTV&#8230; do you suck, or are you just shady? That&#8217;s what I&#8217;m trying to figure out.</p>
<p>I want to order. I have perfect credit. I have never missed a payment on anything ever. I have owned my home for almost a decade, and don&#8217;t plan on moving at all.</p>
<p>It all comes down to about $23. </p>
<p>They want me to pay for them to ship hardware from their facility <em>directly to their installer</em>. I think that is ridiculous. The installer can&#8217;t do their job without the equipment. Certainly I&#8217;m not going to pay for an internal shipment. And they&#8217;re certainly not shipping anything to me.</p>
<p>In any event, DirecTV has been sending us these mailers. It&#8217;s basically the same offer as online, but an extra $5 off each month for a year. <strong>You have to call to receive the offer.</strong> Note the bolding.</p>
<p>Today I call, ready to order. We almost made it through the whole process, but it came down to $23.</p>
<p>It is worth noting, for those who might call and order DirecTV in the future, that I found the conduct of their representatives to be unsettling. I felt like I was being sold, not being allowed to buy, which is basic salesmanship 101. </p>
<p>They kept telling me of features for which I qualified, as if I was getting something that other customers do not get. Their website and advertisement indicate that just about everybody gets these features, if they want, when they sign a contract. Tactics like those can come off as shady. They also revealed details of their location and personal lives that, according to a supervisor, they are not permitted to reveal. It leaves me with the impression that they run a pretty sloppy ship over there.</p>
<p>We went through the whole ordering process, including intrusive questions about what I like to watch on TV that should have been avoided by simply asking if I knew what package I wanted, or if I needed help deciding. So at the very end, they tell me it will be about $23 for shipping. What? I thought shipping was free. Nope, not with this offer, apparently. </p>
<p>It says at the bottom of the mailer, &#8220;$19.95 handling and delivery fee may apply.&#8221; So it <em><strong>may</strong></em> apply. Ok, then, if it <em>may</em> apply, then <em>why</em> does it apply to <em>me</em>? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m told that in order to get the Shipping and Handling fee waived, I have to order online. But, the mailer they sent me directs me to order by phone to get the special deal. If I order online, it is impossible get the deal contained in the advertisement. </p>
<p>While they were happy to tell me about all these features for which I qualified, and raved about my credit, they were unable to tell me a single situation where I would be able to get the deal from the advertisement, but <em>not</em> pay for them to ship hardware to someone who isn&#8217;t me.</p>
<p>According to the DirecTV people with whom I spoke, in order to get the deal as listed on the flier that was sent to me through the mail, I <em>must</em> pay shipping. Period. Nothing would actually be shipped to me. Period.</p>
<p>Instead of saying a fee <em>may</em> apply, they should have said that a fee <em>does</em> apply. Put it right on the advertisement, and let me decide if I want to spend $23 now for $60 in bill reduction over time, or to save the $23 now and not get the extra discount over time. Why hide the shipping fees by saying they <em>may</em> apply, when customer service representatives insist that it <em>must</em> apply in order to get the deal on the advertisement that enticed me to call?</p>
<p>Can that be viewed as anything but shady? How many people signed up from similar fliers as this, and paid shipping without questioning it? Did they know that the flier said they may have to pay shipping, but the actual offer <em>required</em> them to pay shipping? Of course, they wouldn&#8217;t have qualified because, according to DirecTV, the fee that <em>may</em> apply, <em>definitely</em> applies. One thing seems clear,though&#8211; the mailer didn&#8217;t make it clear that I would pay shipping, and the company can&#8217;t tell me any situation where shipping could be avoided.</p>
<p>Twenty bucks, twenty bucks, twenty bucks. It adds up. Lots of mailers. It looks like lots of people <em>may</em> have had to pay a shipping fee, but really <em>had no choice</em> if they wanted the deal in the advertisement.</p>
<p>Now I&#8217;m not so sure I want DirecTV. Between the way they seemed slimy on the phone, the seemingly shady fine print, and their unwillingness to recognize that $23 makes or breaks a sale, I wonder why they deserve my business.</p>
<p>The thing is, I would be a great customer. I love football, and I love hockey. The person who referred me to DirecTV&#8211; and would benefit from the referral&#8211; did it based on the NFL Sunday Ticket, and the NHL Center Ice package. While there hasn&#8217;t been a single football or hockey game in the last five years that I have wanted to watch but couldn&#8217;t, it would sure be a lot more convenient to just turn on the TV. DirecTV really wants to lose those two sales over $23?</p>
<p>Anyway, I tried to call their corporate office, but&#8211; get this&#8211; they were closed due to weather. It doesn&#8217;t bode well for such a large company when their corporate office in Idaho, which receives 32 inches of snow a year, and is covered in snow for two months a year, is closed due to snow.</p>
<p>In any event, I will try to call their corporate office again tomorrow, and ask how I can get the deal from the advertisement and still fall under the <em>may</em> portion of the fine print. Either their customer service department doesn&#8217;t know they can waive the fee, or DirecTV has charged a shipping fee to every single customer who ordered based on the mailed advertisement, even though the fine print indicates that only some people have to pay the fee. And that ignores the fact that <em>nothing</em> is ever actually shipped <em>to the customer</em>.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2012/01/18/directv-may-suck/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Occupy Savannah</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/20/occupy-savannah/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/20/occupy-savannah/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Occupy Savannah is a joke. I&#8217;m not going to go into the lack of impact their protests have had. I will note, however, that during their daily flash mob at the Bank of America branch, there are usually more people waiting in the ATM line than engaged in protest.
This morning, I was driving behind an [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Occupy Savannah is a joke. I&#8217;m not going to go into the lack of impact their protests have had. I will note, however, that during their daily flash mob at the Bank of America branch, there are usually more people waiting in the ATM line than engaged in protest.</p>
<p>This morning, I was driving behind an occupier. Well, not an occupier&#8211; an occupier <em>occupies</em>. This person appeared to be driving to the protest, indicating they were a part time occupier, also known as &#8220;hanging out at the park.&#8221;</p>
<p>Written across the back window of their $19,000 <em>Made in Mexico</em> car was the following:</p>
<p><strong>REPEAL CITIZENS UNITED</strong></p>
<p>Wait&#8230;. w h a t . . . ?</p>
<p>I hope this particular person doesn&#8217;t think we can somehow &#8220;repeal&#8221; a non-profit organization. We can rescind their tax exemption status, but we can&#8217;t &#8220;repeal&#8221; an organization. </p>
<p>The only other reference to Citizens United of which I am aware&#8211; and I am acutely politically aware&#8211; is the <em>Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission</em> Supreme Court decision. I&#8217;m not going to explain what it is, for if you do not know, it is unlikely that you are reading this.</p>
<p>Needless to say, how exactly can a Supreme Court decision be repealed? It <em>can&#8217;t</em>. It is a ruling, not a piece of legislation. It&#8217;s options are either to be overruled by a future Supreme Court decision, rendered moot via a constitutional amendment, or weaseled around with Congressional legislation of questionable constitutionality.</p>
<p>None of those meet the criteria of <em>Repeal Citizens United</em>. This particular individual should occupy the library, and acquire a bit of self-education on how our government works, before attempting to impact change.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/20/occupy-savannah/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Shopping &#8211; Christmas, Grocery, etc.</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/17/shopping-christmas-grocery-etc/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/17/shopping-christmas-grocery-etc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Dec 2011 00:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[1. Attention JC Penney: Shopping in your store is like hunting for buried treasure. Why should I have to walk up to one of your employees and ask, &#8220;Excuse me, where are the clothes that are not for fat ladies?&#8221; You should put up a sign that says, &#8220;Fatties to the left, minnies to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. Attention JC Penney: Shopping in your store is like hunting for buried treasure. Why should I have to walk up to one of your employees and ask, &#8220;Excuse me, where are the clothes that are <em>not</em> for fat ladies?&#8221; You should put up a sign that says, &#8220;Fatties to the left, minnies to the right, and everyone else straight ahead.&#8221; </p>
<p>Of all the dollars I spent today&#8211; and I spent a <em>lot</em> of dollars&#8211; JC Penney didn&#8217;t get any of them, not even with a $10 off $25 coupon.</p>
<p>2. Attention Barnes and Noble: If your website says it is in stock online, and I go to the store and ask for the product, do whatever it takes to find the product. Don&#8217;t tell me you must be out of them without checking your computer. If I can order it online right now, and pick it up from your store in 60 minutes, you clearly have stock. If you cannot be bothered to look up the product I want, I <em>definitely </em>cannot be bothered to drive to your store and find parking, only to deal with employees who cannot be bothered to look up the product I want.</p>
<p>Of all the dollars I spent today&#8211; and I spent a <em>lot</em> of dollars&#8211; Barnes and Noble didn&#8217;t get any of them.</p>
<p>3. Attention chicken producers: I will not pay you several dollars per pound for 15% chicken broth. At $3.00 per pound, that is the equivalent of paying $25.02 per gallon for chicken broth or, more likely, saltwater. I will not pay you 8x the price of gasoline, 8x the price of milk, or 4x the price of chicken broth, for chicken broth. Any chicken product that is more than 5% solution should be labeled as exactly what it is&#8211; <em>chicken product</em>. You know, kind of how people who sell fake chocolate have to describe their product as <em>chocolatey</em> or ice cream that doesn&#8217;t contain cream is described as <em>frozen dairy dessert</em>. </p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/17/shopping-christmas-grocery-etc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey MSNBC, you suck at this!</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/06/hey-msnbc-you-suck-at-this/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/06/hey-msnbc-you-suck-at-this/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Dec 2011 20:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey MSNBC, I tuned in to your network for almost an hour today&#8211; even though it wasn&#8217;t my turn to watch&#8211; to try to catch up on the news. Can you guess what happened? Nope, I didn&#8217;t catch up on the news at all.
In fact, I didn&#8217;t see even a bit of news, not even [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey MSNBC, I tuned in to your network for almost an hour today&#8211; even though it wasn&#8217;t my turn to watch&#8211; to try to catch up on the news. Can you guess what happened? Nope, I didn&#8217;t catch up on the news at all.</p>
<p>In fact, I didn&#8217;t see even a bit of news, not even one second. Any viewers who tuned in to MSNBC between about 2:05PM and 2:56PM EST to catch the headlines of the day were turned away.</p>
<p>Why? MSNBC was too busy airing yet another presidential campaign speech full of platitudes, clichés, and immature partisanship.</p>
<p>Sure, they could discuss the failing EU, the rigged Russian elections, or the two wars we are fighting. But hey, the president is speaking! Why not take a break? The worst that could happen is that some random nobody on some random blog says&#8230;</p>
<p>Hey MSNBC, you suck at this!</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/12/06/hey-msnbc-you-suck-at-this/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Rondo SX Furrian VWH Review</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/30/rondo-sx-furrian-vwh-review/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/30/rondo-sx-furrian-vwh-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2011 01:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I did it again. I bought another guitar.
For those of you keeping score at home, 2011 has been the year of the guitar for me. I have purchased a Fender Standard Jazz Bass, an Agile AL-2000, and Jaime got a Squier Vintage Modified Jaguar Short Scale Bass.
The newest addition is a vintage white SX [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I did it again. I bought another guitar.</p>
<p>For those of you keeping score at home, 2011 has been the year of the guitar for me. I have purchased a Fender Standard Jazz Bass, an Agile AL-2000, and Jaime got a Squier Vintage Modified Jaguar Short Scale Bass.</p>
<p>The newest addition is a vintage white SX Furrian from Rondomusic.com. Rondo originally was selling these guitars for $109.99. Then they dropped them to $99.99. I finally bought one when they lowered the price to $79.99. It fills three gaps in my collection: 1. It is white. 2. It has a maple neck. 3. It is a Tele-style guitar.</p>
<p><img src="http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/4949/sxfurrianvwh.jpg" alt="SX Furrian VWH" /></p>
<p>Here is my review.</p>
<p>Body. The body is nicely done, with smooth cuts. There are no major dings, but the back does have an area where it appears that the sanding was overly aggressive. The color is nice, but the paint job is not so nice. If you look into glare on the guitar, you can see a series of lines in the finish that run parallel with the grain of wood. The clear coat seems soft or thin, and is easily scratched. This guitar should age quickly, which is fine by me. The neck pocket has a hairline crack in the paint (same as my American Standard Strat), and there also was a paint buildup sticking out near the neck that I had to remove and smooth. The biggest issue that still isn&#8217;t a big issue is that there are several random black dots embedded in the finish, one right on the upper bout, the rest on the back or sides. They&#8217;re small enough that you can&#8217;t see them from about 5 feet away. If this was an expensive guitar, it would be completely unacceptable. But for $80, meh.</p>
<p>Hardware. The body hardware is a mixed bag. The pickguard is dual layer black-and-white and has a softer matte finish than most budget instruments, which is a nice touch. It had the rippled edges that you would expect on a budget instrument, and that was easily fixed with some sandpaper. The screws are straight, but cheap. The bridge and string saddles are of adequate quality. One of the screws for the bridge plate is installed at an angle, but secure. The six holes that hold the six screws that attach the string saddles to the bridge plate seem rough and slightly undersized. There is a bit of a gap between the head of the screw and the bridge plate. Some cleanup with a Dremel should fix this. The control plate is adequate. The knobs are surprisingly nice. The switch tip looked like they popped it off a mold for a model airplane, and required some shaving. The jack mount is of the football variety, and seems to be similar to every other football jack I&#8217;ve seen. The neck plate is thin, and the neck screws are cheap. The strap buttons are cheap.</p>
<p>Electronics. The electronics are just ok. The switch feels cheap, the pots are cheap, and the pickups leave much to be desired. The bridge pickup in my guitar was ridiculously microphonic. When removed from the guitar and hooked directly up to an amp, you could speak into the pickup and hear your voice. When it was in the guitar, you could hear the strap moving as you played. Kurt sent me out a new pickup that solved the problem. Still, the pickups are cheap ceramics with plastic bobbins, and will be replaced. The jack is of the cheap variety, but adequate. The soldering was done fairly well, with only a couple of cold joints that looked like they could use a reflow. I did shield the guitar because single coils do not play well with my noisy house power.</p>
<p>Neck. Overall, the neck is pretty nice. It comes covered with odd this orange tint that I quickly removed with paint stripper, revealing the maple below. Unfortunately, it also revealed a few areas where the neck was sanded after the sealer was applied, and so now I am left with bare wood in spots. My plan is to do a full refinish with Formby&#8217;s Tung Oil.</p>
<p>Frets. The fretwork is pretty good. There are a couple of frets that are a tad bit higher than the rest. It doesn&#8217;t make the instrument unplayable, and it seems like a perfect guitar for learning how to do fretwork. </p>
<p>Nut. The nut is actually of better quality than I expected, and was well cut but sloppy. I did a bit of cleanup while I had it out while stripping the neck, and I do not plan on changing it</p>
<p>Tuners. The tuners are junk. They move up and down as you turn them, and they seem to have dead spots. They are stable once set, but they need to be replaced to increase tuning accuracy. The string tees are also not very good. They had sharp edges and were causing the strings to bind when tuning or bending. Some sandpaper smoothed them out, and the result was greatly improved tuning stability.</p>
<p>Setup. The setup was mixed. The neck relief was set correctly, but not for the light strings that were on the guitar. My thicker strings pulled it to within 0.001&#8243; of where I like it to be. The pickup height seemed random. The biggest setup issue, though, was the action. The low E string was at 9/64&#8243;, where it should be 4/64&#8243;. All the strings were between 4/64&#8243; and 6/64&#8243; too high. The E strings had the string saddles installed at severe angles, leaning in towards the other strings. It was very odd, and I can&#8217;t imagine that anyone could think it was correct. The intonation was dead on for most stings, with minor adjustments needed on two strings. This will all need to be changed, though, after I clean up where the string saddle screws set against the bridge plate.</p>
<p>Overall. This is a decent little guitar. It is more than I expected for the money. I would not recommend it to a beginner. The little issues here and there could be enough to prevent a beginner from sticking with it. I also wouldn&#8217;t recommend it to someone who is uncomfortable working on their own guitar. It doesn&#8217;t make sense to pay someone to fix any issues you find on an $80 guitar. If you can&#8217;t do the work, don&#8217;t get the guitar.</p>
<p>BUT&#8230; if you are comfortable doing some work, and appropriately adjust your expectations before buying, you will be extremely satisfied. If you look past the fit and finish issues, and the low quality hardware and pickups, you will see that you are getting a very nice body and a very nice neck for very little money.</p>
<p>This guitar seems like a great platform for improvement and customization. I plan on replacing the strap buttons, the tuners, and the string tees as soon as possible, and eventually the pickups. I&#8217;m going to use it to learn how to refinish necks, and to learn how to do fretwork. It is such an inexpensive instrument that it doesn&#8217;t bother me if it picks up some scratches. I would buy another one in an instant.</p>
<p>If there are any areas I missed, let me know!</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/30/rondo-sx-furrian-vwh-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>And now, a bit of politics.</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/30/and-now-a-bit-of-politics/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/30/and-now-a-bit-of-politics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=415</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I can&#8217;t resist.
The Washington Post has published an article that explains how the CIA and DNI plan on hosting a scaled back &#8220;year-end&#8221; party this year. The article describes the fancy food and served booze that our tax dollars provided last year.
It then goes on to cite Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who apparently [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t resist.</p>
<p>The Washington Post has published an article that explains how the CIA and DNI plan on hosting a scaled back &#8220;year-end&#8221; party this year. The article describes the fancy food and served booze that our tax dollars provided last year.</p>
<p>It then goes on to cite Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, who apparently needs to direct a little more of his agency&#8217;s product to his own office, who said: </p>
<blockquote><p>Scaling back our holiday celebrations is just another small example of our commitment to making sure that we continue to make wise fiscal decisions across the board.</p></blockquote>
<p>Seriously? Our Director of National Intelligence considers it to be a &#8220;wise financial decision&#8221; for an organization to throw a party when that organization&#8217;s parent entity (the federal government) is currently carrying FIVE TIMES annual income as debt?</p>
<p>Here is the equivalent. You&#8217;re driving a school bus loaded with kids. You&#8217;re going 65 MPH downhill, quickly approaching a cliff that can only be avoided by making a sharp turn. In an attempt to slow your bus and avoid near-certain death, you <s>stomp on the brakes</s> fly your hand out the window to increase air resistance. Sure, you still plummet over the cliff, and you and a bus load of kids still die, but at least you did your part to slow the bus.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a thought: CANCEL THE PARTY.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another thought: Have the party at a public restaurant, pay for a single bland chicken entree that everyone gets, and allow your employees to participate in a cash bar if they so choose.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a final thought: C A N C E L    T H E    P A R T Y .</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/30/and-now-a-bit-of-politics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thanksgiving Fun</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/26/thanksgiving-fun/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/26/thanksgiving-fun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=410</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, not quite fun.
We did have an excellent Thanksgiving, even though one of our guests was stranded up north due to weather. That, however, is not the subject of this post. The subject of this post is home repairs, and how they almost always occur at the absolute worst time.
About six hours ago, at 1:00AM, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, not quite fun.</p>
<p>We did have an excellent Thanksgiving, even though one of our guests was stranded up north due to weather. That, however, is not the subject of this post. The subject of this post is home repairs, and how they almost always occur at the absolute worst time.</p>
<p>About six hours ago, at 1:00AM, the trouble began. Our guest noted a gurgling sound coming from the kitchen. I went in to check it out, and confirmed what I had suspected&#8211; the drain was definitely slow. Not good. Last time we had that sound, I had to tear out my downstairs bathroom to the studs and the floor joists and rebuild it from scratch.</p>
<p>I cleared the sink (who would have thought that I could mess four full loads of dishes in less than 36 hours), and inspected. The water was slowly draining, so I was hopeful. I employed the double plunger method, as suggested by our guest, in an attempt to force out the blockage. It seemed like I had made some progress. Water was draining fast. A quick flush of the toilet and a flooded bathroom indicated otherwise.</p>
<p>I went outside and opened one of the cleanouts. All the backed up material came flooding out. Not good. I went under the house, and opened the other cleanout. There was water to the top of the 4&#8243; pipe. Again, not good.</p>
<p>As I was now covered in some pretty nasty stuff and couldn&#8217;t use the water, there was no way I could go to bed. I decided to stay up until Home Depot opened at 6:00AM, and I researched my options.</p>
<p>The plan was to first try a bladder. This is a rubber balloon-like device that you attach to your garden hose, and insert into the pipe. The pressure from the hose causes the bladder to expand, sealing the system upstream, and subsequently sprays water into the pipe. In theory, the hydraulic effect pushes out the blockage.</p>
<p>The secondary option was to rent a drain rooter. This is the big snake device that plumbers often use to clear drains. Almost certain to work, and with my luck, almost certain to cause immense amounts of expensive damage in the process.</p>
<p>The third option was to call a plumber and proceed to fill his (or her) crack with cash (sorry plumbers, you must get sick of those jokes, until you get paid, that is!).</p>
<p>I was at Home Depot when the opened, and was back home by 6:05AM. I rigged the bladder up to the hose, and climbed under the house as daylight was just barely visible. I wasn&#8217;t comfortable being under the house near electrical wiring while spraying water at high pressure, so I rigged up a valve that I could control while standing outside. I went to stuff the bladder into the nearly overflowing pipe and realized&#8230; it was empty. That was good, I thought&#8211; it&#8217;s not a full blockage.</p>
<p>I put in the bladder, crawled out from under the house, and slowly applied the water. I could hear water spraying in the pipe, so I knew it was filling. After about five minutes of increasing pressure, the spraying noise had stopped. It sounded like water was flowing. Success!</p>
<p>I shut off the water, ready to close things up and hit the shower. Alas, it was wishful thinking. All of the water that I had just pumped into the pipe began flowing out of the cleanout. I quickly turned the water back on in hopes that the bladder would re-expand and re-seal the pipe. It did.</p>
<p>I let it flow with my ear on the sewer pipe (good times) until it sounded like it did before&#8211; silence. I then added slightly more pressure. With that, I heard a huge &#8216;woooosh&#8217; sound that lasted about five seconds and then transitioned to the spraying sound of the bladder in an empty pipe.</p>
<p>I turned off the water, and removed the bladder. No back flow. I went inside and turned on the kitchen and bathroom sinks, and crawled under the house. Between the both of them, there was less than 1/4&#8243; of water in the pipe.</p>
<p>SUCCESS!</p>
<p>I started at 6:05, and finished at 6:50. Nice. I woke up Jaime and told her everything was fixed (as she asked), and hit the shower. Now I&#8217;m enjoying a nice cup of coffee and having a nice, quiet morning.</p>
<p>In the grand scheme of home repairs, I rate this to be relatively simple, very cost effective, excessively inconvenient, and <em>extremely</em> disgusting.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/11/26/thanksgiving-fun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Samsung still sucks</title>
		<link>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/10/17/samsung-still-sucks/</link>
		<comments>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/10/17/samsung-still-sucks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 18:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/?p=401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yep, Samsung still sucks.
I finally got the replacement for my printer. For those of you keeping score at home, it has been 46 DAYS since I first contacted Samsung about my printer problem.
The printer that arrived to replace my MINT condition, 5-month old printer is cosmetically junk. It is NOWHERE NEAR the condition of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep, Samsung still sucks.</p>
<p>I finally got the replacement for my printer. For those of you keeping score at home, it has been 46 DAYS since I first contacted Samsung about my printer problem.</p>
<p>The printer that arrived to replace my MINT condition, 5-month old printer is cosmetically junk. It is NOWHERE NEAR the condition of the printer I sent in for repair. </p>
<p>My printer sits on top of a filing cabinet in a locked room where nobody&#8211; not even my cats&#8211; are allowed to go. There are NO opportunities for damage, scrapes, scuffs, or discoloration. I had only filled the paper tray ONCE ever. The printer I sent in, with the exception that it wouldn&#8217;t print, was FLAWLESS.</p>
<p>I count at least 15 scratches on the fake carbon fiber top on the printer they sent me. On the handle on the front, more scratches, but these were accompanied by a stranger&#8217;s finger prints! The paper tray also has obvious scratches that they (poorly) attempted to buff out.</p>
<p>Come on Samsung, it has been 46 days since I initiated this. You can&#8217;t possibly expect me to be satisfied with a scuffed up dirty printer. </p>
<p>This is insanity.</p>
<p>That is all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://mikesblog.americasdebate.com/2011/10/17/samsung-still-sucks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

